|
1
|
- Lance Fortnow
- NEC Laboratories America
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Born:
April 25, 1903
Tambov, Russia
- Died:
Oct. 20, 1987
|
|
6
|
- Born:
June 14, 1903
Washington, DC
- Died:
August 11, 1995
|
|
7
|
- Born:
Dec. 28, 1903
Budapest, Hungary
- Died:
Feb. 8, 1957
|
|
8
|
- Born:
Feb. 22, 1903
Cambridge, England
- Died:
January 19, 1930
- Founder of Ramsey Theory
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Logic
- Concrete Complexity
- Complexity Classes
- Parallelism
- Algorithms
- Computational Geometry
|
|
12
|
- Quantum
- Logic
- Game Theory
- Ergodic Theory
- Hydrodynamics
- Cellular Automata
- Computers
|
|
13
|
- Every finite zero-sum two-person game has optimal mixed strategies.
- Let A be the payoff matrix for a player.
|
|
14
|
- Worst case expected runtime of randomized algorithm for any input equals
best case running time of a deterministic algorithm for worst
distribution of inputs.
- Invaluable for proving limitations of probabilistic algorithms.
|
|
15
|
- Given a coin with an unknown bias p, how do we get an unbiased coin
flip?
|
|
16
|
- Given a coin with an unknown bias p, how do we get an unbiased coin
flip?
|
|
17
|
- Given a coin with an unknown bias p, how do we get an unbiased coin
flip?
|
|
18
|
- Von Neumann’s coin flipping trick (1951) was the first to get true
randomness from a weak random source.
- Much research in TCS in 1980’s and 90’s to handle weaker dependent
sources.
- Led to development of extractors and connections to pseudorandom
generators.
|
|
19
|
- Lambda Calculus
- Church’s Theorem
- No decision procedure for arithmetic.
- Church-Turing Thesis
- Everything that is computable is computable by the lambda calculus.
|
|
20
|
- Alonzo Church 1930’s
- A simple way to define and manipulate functions.
- Has full computational power.
- Basis of functional programming languages like Lisp, Haskell, ML.
|
|
21
|
- x
- xy
- lx.xx
- lxy.yx
- lxyz.yzx(luv.vu)
|
|
22
|
- a-conversion
- lx.xx equivalent to ly.yy
- b-reduction
- lx.xx(z) equivalent to zz
- Some rules for appropriate restrictions on name clashes
- (lx.(ly.yx))y should not be same as ly.yy
|
|
23
|
- A l-expression is in normal form if one cannot apply any b-reductions.
- Church-Rosser Theorem (1936)
- If a l-expression M reduces to both A and B then there must be a C such
that A reduces to C and B reduces to C.
- If M reduces to A and B with A and B in normal form, then A = B.
|
|
24
|
- Church (1936) showed that it is impossible in the l-calculus to decide
whether a term M has a normal form.
- Church’s Thesis
- Expressed as a Definition
- An effectively calculable function of the positive integers is a l-definable
function of the positive integers.
|
|
25
|
- Kleene-Church (1936)
- Computing Normal Forms has equivalent power to the recursive functions
of Turing machines.
- Church-Turing Thesis
- Everything computable is computable by a Turing machine.
|
|
26
|
- Measure Theory
- Probability
- Analysis
- Intuitionistic Logic
- Cohomology
- Dynamical Systems
- Hydrodynamics
|
|
27
|
- A way to measure the amount of information in a string by the size of
the smallest program generating that string.
|
|
28
|
- For all n there is an x, |x| = n, K(x) ³ n.
- Such x are called random.
- Use to prove lower bounds on various combinatorical and computational
objects.
- Assume no lower bound.
- Choose random x.
- Get contradiction by giving
a short program for x.
|
|
29
|
- Ramsey Theory/Combinatorics
- Oracles
- Turing Machine Complexity
- Number Theory
- Circuit Complexity
- Communication Complexity
- Average-Case Lower Bounds
|
|
30
|
- Li-Vitanyi ’92: For Universal Distributions Average Case = Worst Case
- Instance Complexity
- Universal Search
- Time-Bounded Universal Distributions
- Kolmogorov characterizations of computational complexity classes.
|
|
31
|
- Measuring sizes of sets using Kolmogorov Complexity
- Computational Depth to measure the amount of useful information in a
string.
|
|
32
|
- How can we use Kolmogorov complexity to measure the size
of a set?
|
|
33
|
- How can we use Kolmogorov complexity to measure the size
of a set?
|
|
34
|
- How can we use Kolmogorov complexity to measure the size
of a set?
|
|
35
|
- How can we use Kolmogorov complexity to measure the size
of a set?
- The string in An of highest Kolmogorov complexity tells us
about |An|.
|
|
36
|
- There must be a string x in An such that K(x) ≥ log |An|.
- Simple counting argument, otherwise not enough programs for all elements
of An.
|
|
37
|
- If A is computable, or even computably enumerable then every string in An
has
K(x) ≤ log |An|.
- Describe x by A and index of x in enumeration of strings of An.
|
|
38
|
- If A is computable enumerable then
|
|
39
|
- What if A is efficiently computable?
- Do we have a clean way to characterize the size of A using time-bounded
Kolmogorov complexity?
|
|
40
|
- Idea: A short description is only useful if we can reconstruct the
string in a reasonable amount of time.
|
|
41
|
- It is still the case that some element x in An has Kpoly(x)
≥ log |A|.
- Very possible that there are small A with x in A with Kpoly(x)
quite large.
|
|
42
|
- Might be easier to recognize elements in A than generate them.
|
|
43
|
- Instead of generating the string, we just need to distinguish it from
other strings.
|
|
44
|
- Ideally would like
- True if P = NP.
- Problem: Need to distinguish all pairs of elements in An
|
|
45
|
- Intuitively we need
- Buhrman-Laplante-Miltersen (2000) prove this lower bound in black-box
model.
|
|
46
|
- Buhrman-Fortnow-Laplante (2002) show
- We have a rough approximation of size
|
|
47
|
- Sipser 1983: Allowing randomness gives a cleaner connection.
- Sipser used this and similar results to show how to simulate randomness
by alternation.
|
|
48
|
- Simple strings convey small amount of information.
- 00000000000000000000000000000000
- Random string have lots of information
- 00100011100010001010101011100010
- Random strings are not that useful because we can generate random
strings easily.
|
|
49
|
- Chaitin ’87/Bennett ’97
- Roughly the amount of time needed to produce a string x from a program p
whose length is close to the length of the shortest program for x.
|
|
50
|
- Antunes, Fortnow, Variyam and van Melkebeek 2001
- Use the difference of two Kolmogorov measures.
- Deptht(x) = Kt(x) – K(x)
- Closely related to “randomness deficiency” notion of Levin (1984).
|
|
51
|
- Shallow Sets
- Generalizes random and sparse sets with similar computational power.
- L is “easy on average” iff time required is exponential in depth.
- Can easily find satisfying assignment if many such assignments have low
depth.
|
|
52
|
- Several great men that helped create the fundamentals of computer
science and set the stage for computational complexity.
|
|
53
|
- Alan Turing
- Born:
June 23, 1912
London, England
- Died:
June 7, 1954
|